GES Center Publications
Tradition Meets Innovation
Modesta Abugu: Improving Sweetpotato Flavor for Nutrition Security
Blog: Archea, Microbial Superheroes?
NC State part of $26 million grant to study microbiomes
Exploring the Social, Ethical Sides of Microbiome Engineering
Researchers Propose New Framework for Regulating Engineered Crops
NC State to Research Implications of Engineered Microbiomes with New NSF Center Grant
NC State Brings Expertise, Interdisciplinarity to Galapagos Consortium
¿Será la edición génica una alternativa de corto plazo para hacer frente a la subida de precios de alimentos?
Seed Funding Speeds Growth for TreeCo — an NC State Startup
Some of our most recent faculty publications. See the full, searchable database of GES-related faculty publications here.
GES affiliated faculty and graduate students may submit publications to include on the website here.Special Collection: Executive Order on Biotechnology-related publications
|10.1073/pnas.2213308119. PDF||Genetic biocontrol, Gene drive, Invasive rodents, Conservation, Modeling|
|10.1016/j.isci.2022.105423. PDF. Graphical abstract||Global change, Environmental management, Nature conservation, Biotechnology, Environmental Biotechnology|
|10.1079/9781800621176.0024||Genetic control, Invasive species, Public engagement, Stakeholders, Transgenic insects|
Eradication of Commelina benghalensis in a long-term experiment using a multistakeholder governance model: A case of regulatory concerns defeating ecological management successLeon, R., Creamer, N., Reberg-Horton, S., & Franzluebbers, A. (2022). Eradication of Commelina benghalensis in a long-term experiment using a multistakeholder governance model: A case of regulatory concerns defeating ecological management success. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 15(3), 152-159. doi: 10.1017/inp.2022.23. PDF
|Decision, Fumigation, Invasion, Mapping, Monitoring, Negotiation, Scouting|
|10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.027 PDF. Graphical Abstract||Nanotechnology, Nano-agrifoods, Responsible innovation, Policy|
|10.1007/s43508-022-00046-x (*Open-access link). PDF||Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), Governance systems, Emerging technologies|
|Toward product-based regulation of crops." Science 377, 1051 (2022). DOI: 10.1126/science.abo3034 (*Open-access link)||Product-based regulation, CRISPR, Bioengineered crops|
Journals and Workshop Reports
Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Development of a Gene Drive Mouse for Biodiversity Protection on Islands: Landscape Analysis and Workshop Report
Authors: Jason Delborne, Julie Shapiro, Mahmud Farroque, S. Kathleen Barnhill-Dilling, Tyler Ford, Dalton George, and Sonia Dermer (2019)
Mice offer an ideal genetic model for exploring the possibility of developing a synthetic gene drive in mammals. As pests, they pose challenges to human health (through disease transmission), agricultural yields and storage, and biodiversity, especially on islands where they are not native. In line with the guidance of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on gene drive research (NASEM, 2016), if research on gene drives in mice were to progress to a field trial, an island ecosystem would offer an additional level of physical containment. Thus, the focal application for the stakeholder landscape analysis and this workshop is the potential for developing and releasing a gene drive mouse on an island to suppress an invasive mouse population that poses a threat to biodiversity endemic to that island (e.g., nesting seabirds).
Authors: Jason Delborne, Andrew Binder, Louie Rivers, Jessica Cavin Barnes, S. Kathleen Barnhill-Dilling, Dalton George, Adam Kokotovich, and Jayce Sudweeks (2018)
In April 2018, a team of NC State faculty and students convened a stakeholder workshop to explore opportunities for public engagement surrounding the development, regulatory review, and potential deployment of a genetically engineered American chestnut tree. As perhaps the first GMO designed to spread and persist in the wild, the tree has the potential to restore a functionally extinct species but also raises important ethical, political, ecological, and cultural questions. This report describes the workshop and its purpose, details the substance of the discussions, and offers the research team’s perspective on lessons learned and ways forward.
Journal of Responsible Innovation: Roadmap to Gene Drives – Research and Governance Needs in Social, Political, and Ecological Context
Edited by: Jason Delborne, Jennifer Kuzma, Fred Gould, Emma Frow, Caroline Leitschuh, and Jayce Sudweeks (2018)
The Genetic Engineering and Society Center at hosted a workshop in February of 2016, supported in part by the National Science Foundation, entitled ‘A Roadmap to Gene Drives: A Deliberative Workshop to Develop Frameworks for Research and Governance.’ (see workshop site)
In order to examine core governance issues and research needs in an anticipatory way, this 3-day workshop brought together over 70 subject matter experts from academia, business, government, and non-profit organizations from 10 different countries in Europe, Australia, and North and South America. Those experts were invited to submit papers for this special issue of the Journal of Responsible Innovation. In total, 13 peer-reviewed papers are included in the special Gene Drive issue of the Journal.
BMC Proceedings: Environmental Release of Engineered Pests: Building an International Governance Framework
Edited by Lucy Carter, Zachary Brown and Fred Gould (2018)
In October 2016, a two-day meeting of 65 academic, government and industry professionals was held at North Carolina State University for early-stage discussions about the international governance of gene drives: potentially powerful new technologies that can be used for the control of pests, invasive species, and disease vectors. (see workshop site)
Presenters at the meeting prepared seven manuscripts elaborating on the ideas raised. This BMC Proceedings issue presents the collection of these peer-reviewed manuscripts.
Authors: Pat Roberts, Sharon Stauffer, Christopher Cummings, and Jennifer Kuzma (2015)
In order to explore risk governance data needs, opportunities, and challenges for SynBio, we initiated a research project funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2013. This project had the overarching goals to “unpack” the broad field of SynBio for more nuanced and productive policy discussions and help set priorities for risk-relevant data collection, organizational and/or legislative readiness for oversight, and public and stakeholder engagement. In doing so, the project chose four case studies of potential applications of SynBio that are not yet in the final stages of research and development. We employed a four-round policy Delphi study to anticipate governance needs upstream of technology development and consumer use. (see Synthetic Biology Sloan Foundation Grant site)
- How might bioengineered fungal endophytes be regulated in the U.S.? (Katie Barnhill-Dilling and Jason Delborne, September 2021)
- Stakeholder Perspectives on Modified Foliar Fungal Endophytes (Katie Barnhill-Dilling and Jason Delborne, September 2021)
- Genome Editing in Latin America: Regional Regulatory Overview/Edición génica aplicada a la agricultura: Resumen del marco regulatorio regional (Todd Kuiken and Jennifer Kuzma. July 2021)
- Genome Editing in Latin America: CRISPR Patent and Licensing Policy/ Edición génica aplicada a la agricultura: Politicas de patentes y licencias CRISPR en Americá Latina (Margo Bagley, July 2021)
- Synthetic Microorganisms for Agricultural Use (Johanna Elsensohn and Kelly Sears, 2017)
- Public Response to New Technologies in Food Depends on the Type of Tech (Matt Shipman, 2015)
- Sloan SynBio Briefs
Statement on Productive, Inclusive, and Ethical Communication
Adopted June 28, 2013
Genetic engineering encompasses technologies, practices, and policies that can affect all of society and must be informed by substantial, rigorous, open, and inclusive civic deliberation. The Genetic Engineering and Society (GES) Center at North Carolina State University has adopted the following guidelines to promote productive, inclusive, and ethical communication. Download